"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" - Dr. Edmund Burke
Kentucky Family

PRESS RELEASE: “Is the gambling bill in trouble in committee?” asks family group

For Immediate Release
February 16, 2012
Contact: Martin Cothran
Phone: (859) 329-1919

LEXINGTON, KY—The Family Foundation said today that not only has Gov. Steve Beshear’s gambling bill lost majority support in the State Senate, but it may be in trouble in the committee to which it was assigned. “The support for this bill is crumbling so fast, it may not even make it out of committee,” said Martin Cothran, senior policy analyst for the group.

“The governor just got finished launching his casino bill, and in less than 24 hours it was already starting to look like the Voyage of the Damned.”

Cothran said even though the Senate State and Local Government Committee, where SB 151 has been assigned, is the most pro-gambling committee in the Senate, the governor’s bill is now hanging on by only one vote. “The bottom is falling out of the expanded gambling effort,” he said. “If this bill is in danger in this committee, then it’s even deader than we thought, and we thought it was pretty dead.”

Cothran noted that the bill, which the governor had weeks to get right, seems to have gotten it all wrong. “This was the best chance anyone has ever had to pass a casino bill,” he said. “And the governor blew it.”

Kentucky’s “Failed” Gambling Amendment: Day 3

Twenty years ago the topic of casinos at the race tracks was first placed before the legislature. In the last eleven years nine bills have actually been filed. Politicians now say that the issue needs to be decided “once and for all by the people.” Since we actually have a representative form of government, and not a referendum form like Maine and other states, it seems that Kentuckians have decided this issue “once and for all” eight times previously through our representatives. Only the foolish believe that if the casinos are defeated that they will go away. “Once and for all” means until next year.

The sponsor said “At the end of the day, I trust the people of Kentucky.” (Gregory A. Hall, “Gov. Steve Beshear unveils gambling amendment,: The Courier-Journal, February 15, 2012) The real question is whether the people can trust the legislators. They are asking for a blank check worth hundreds of millions, to be disbursed however they see fit. We can be sure it will not be directed toward the unglamorous task of closing the budget gap (which is quite adjustable) or funding the state retirement program.

This amendment is welfare for the wealthy. The horse tracks in Kentucky are the playthings of the very wealthy. The tracks are an investment that they hope will pay off immensely. Since the legislature has already given several tax breaks as consolation prizes when the tracks lost the casino issue, the tracks can count on a low 28-35% tax rate. No 50% rate like Illinois or 55% rate like Pennsylvania, just a bargain rate. Kentucky would be sold cheaply if this succeeds.

There is little recognition of the social costs. Except for the increased welfare costs and lost revenues from closed businesses in the casino neighborhoods, the cost of casinos is absorbed by families whose members gamble. Poverty will increase in a poverty stricken state.

Section 2 of the bill, which contains the amendment wording, includes the grocery list of admirable causes on which to spend the money, including the aid to the wealthy track owners and an indirect trickle (comparatively) for horse owners and breeders.

If our legislators let us down, and pass this, it will not be the people who decide, but the DOLLARS.

Written by Ivan Zabilka, Research Consultant to The Family Foundation

THE BILL ARRIVES

The bill to amend the Constitution to allow casinos (seven of them) was filed yesterday.  Kentucky is not a referendum state, but amendments to the Constitution must be accepted or rejected by the people.  The trumpet call in Frankfort is “Let the people decide!”  What is meant is “Let the DOLLARS decide!”

Bob Elliston, president of Turfway Park, indicated that the “tracks are willing to finance a campaign to pass it.” (Janet Patton, “Casino amendment introduced.” Lexington Herald-Leader, February 15, p. A-9)  As proven during recent sessions they are also willing to finance legislators as well.  Since Turfway is half owned by a Harrah’s (or Promus) subsidiary, we might suspect where the money will come from.

The person filing the amendment, Damon Thayer, a Republican, is a consultant to two Kentucky horse farms, who would benefit from increased breeder’s incentives.   The minority floor manager in the Senate (who will line up the Democratic votes) is an employee of a bank owned by the co-owner of Thunder Ridge, a horse track in eastern Kentucky.  To most of us these key players appear to have conflicts of interest.  The Legislative Ethics Commission says there is no conflict of other members of the same class also benefit.  So as long as four other tracks benefit, there is no conflict for an employee of the owner of one track to promote a bill that could benefit the track.

This bill is one paragraph.  In 2008 the enabling legislation was 136 pages long.  This time there is no enabling legislation, so voters are allowing the legislature a free hand to do whatever they want after the voters pass the amendment.  Since we know how much political promises are worth, this is an awful amendment that could lead to terrible results, where conscientious legislators could be overwhelmed by the awakened greed of other legislators.

The two non-track casinos sound like a payoff to Bill Yung, a casino owner, who gave a million dollars to help elect Governor Beshear.  The five racetracks provision means three tracks will be out in the cold with The Red Mile sure to be one of them since it has the misfortune of being within 60 miles (actually about 5) of Keeneland.  This once premier harness track in the nation will slowly fade into memory.  And do you really think any thoroughbred track will lose out to a harness track?

It is really hard to write a paragraph to make five tracks wealthy that pleases everyone.  This amendment will turn those five tracks into West Virginia where most races are watched by 300 or so live patrons and the gambling is by people watching screens at other tracks. That’s saving horse racing?

Press Release: Majority of senators against “favors for fat cats”

For Immediate Release
February 15, 2012
Contact: Martin Cothran

Phone: (859) 329-1919

LEXINGTON, KY—The Family Foundation announced today that there is now majority opposition in the State Senate to the governor’s expanded gambling effort. ”After yesterday’s announcement by State Sen. Dan Seum that he is opposed to Gov. Steve Beshear’s gambling bill,” said Martin Cothran, the group’s spokesman, ”our count now shows majority opposition to the Governor’s plan of favors for fat cats.”

“Lawmakers are already voting on the governor’s gambling bill—with their feet.”

The bill needs 23 votes from among the 38 senators because it is a constitutional amendment. Cothran said the bill now has 18 votes at best, with 19 senators opposed or not in favor.

Cothran said the announcement of the specifics of the Governor’s legislation has only resulted in a loss of support. The bill parcels out five casino licenses for horse racing tracks and two licenses for stand-alone casinos. “The more lawmakers consider the wisdom of giving the governor’s campaign contributors the equivalent of orchestra seats in the state’s Constitution, the less they seem to support the idea.”

Cothran noted that the bill only had eight senate co-sponsors, and that only ten senators bothered to show up for yesterday’s press conference announcing the bill, SB 151. “If the governor has the 23 votes he’s claiming, where were they yesterday?”

CASINO AMENDMENT

In Kentucky we have 60 day legislative sessions in even numbered years, and 30 day sessions in odd numbered years. Long sessions stretch into early April.  In long sessions the filing deadline for the May primaries is about half way through the session, which occurred last Friday this year.  No controversial votes happen until after the filing deadline, so that a vote will not make someone mad enough to file to run.  These are expensive days for the taxpayers.

As in other years, little is accomplished except a few committee meetings and some resolutions honoring citizens for various reasons.  This year redistricting has complicated things.  A state judge declared the first legislative plan unconstitutional, and extended the filing deadline for districts as they currently exist.  A second plan has now been approved, and the first decision has been appealed.  Although Elbridge Gerry may not ring a bell with many legislators, they have Gerrymandered this second one in interesting ways.  My little county (ext door to Lexington) which sometimes votes Republican, has been moved from a sometimes Republican district that is currently held by the Democrats, to an overwhelmingly Democratic controlled district that now stretches from south of Lexington (13 miles) to Louisville and Ft. Knoz in the west.  Democrats will no loger need to campaign here.

All this has thrown complications into the casino plans for Kentucky.  First they had to postpone introducing their bill, so that it would not get buried by redistricting.  Then the Governor proudly proclaimed that he had 23 Senate votes to carry the bill through the part of the legislature controlled by the Republicans.  That would be 60.5% where 60% is needed for an amendment.  Opponents could only find 18 Senators who would admit they would vote for it.

Then the Governor said that a Republican, Damon Thayer, would introduce the legislation. That began to unravel when it was revealed that his private consulting firm represented one auto racing track and three horse farms (one in Louisiana).  The two Kentucky horse farms had benefitted from Thayer’s legislative efforts, creating a mild conflict of interest.  The Governor said he would be flexible about who would introduce the legislation.

But this is the week.  Several sources believe that the bill will be filed this week.  Legislators are still grumbling that it is inappropriate to give a monopoly to one industry, although many other states have.  The opponents are still out there: The Council of Churches, the Catholic Conference, the Kentucky Baptist Convention, The Family Foundation, and the Kentucky League on Alcohol and Gambling Problems.  The state remains about evenly divided.  The weeks to come will be exciting with some really ugly political statements, and one side or the other wailing and gnashing teeth and crying foul.  Stay tuned.

Casino bill an “abuse of the State Constitution” says anti-slots group

For Immediate Release
February 14, 2012
Contact: Martin Cothran

Phone: (859) 329-1919

LEXINGTON, KY—The Family Foundation called the Governor’s casino bill an “abuse of the State Constitution” and said it was “not the bill Kentuckians were promised.” The comments came in response to today’s filing of the Governor’s casino gambling bill.

“This bill is an attempt by wealthy horse track owners and casino interests to buy their way into the Constitution like box seats at a ball game,” said Martin Cothran, spokesman for the group.

Cothran called the attempt to write a wealthy industry into the Constitution “unprecedented.” “This state has never amended its Constitution to favor one industry like this. This bill writes political favors for the Governor’s campaign contributors into the very words of the Constitution. The Constitution shouldn’t be used by politicians to reward their wealthy friends.”

Cothran also pointed out that the people of Kentucky were promised that the money lost by gamblers at slot machines would go to education, health care, public safety, and local government. “But this bill doesn’t include any of that. There are favors for fat cats, but no specific provisions for public programs. It just shows what money, power, and influence can accomplish.”

His group thinks the bill has little chance of passage in the State Senate, where Cothran said the bill has been steadily losing support over the last four weeks.

Gambling rally an “occupation of Capitol Rotunda by the 1 percent”

For Immediate Release
February 9, 2012
Contact: Martin Cothran

Phone: (859) 329-1919

LEXINGTON, KY—The Family Foundation called today’s press conference by business and education groups in support of gambling legislation “an occupation of the Capitol Rotunda by the 1 percent.” The group also said the organizations holding the pep rally all had a financial interest in expanded gambling. It also said that the effort was too little, too late to resurrect legislation it says has been dead for weeks.

Martin Cothran, spokesman for the group, said that groups that are supposed to represent business interests and organizations that pretend to support education were “throwing their constituencies under the bus.” “The only businesses this will help are casino corporations and wealthy horse track owners,” he said. “Small business will be victimized by casinos that suck all the economic oxygen out of local economies.”

Cothran pointed to the absence of lawmakers at the event as further evidence that the bill lacks support in the General Assembly. “Where were the 23 senators the Governor claims support his bill? We didn’t see them today. We counted at most two lawmakers. If that isn’t a vote of no confidence, then we don’t know what is.” Cothran added that the other thing missing at the rally was an actual bill. “We’re not entirely clear on what they were there to support,” he said. “There is no bill.”

Cothran said the bill would already have been introduced if expanded gambling advocates had the support they claimed to have. “The Governor keeps making excuses. He attacks the Senate President and he points to the filing deadline as complications for his legislation. The only reason the Governor hasn’t introduced a bill is because he doesn’t have the votes.”

PRESS RELEASE: Group says Beshear “lacks confidence in his own legislation,” challenges Governor to “stop playing politics”and file the gambling bill

For Immediate Release
February 6, 2012
Contact: Martin Cothran
Phone: (859) 329-1919

LEXINGTON, KY–The Family Foundation said today that Gov. Steve Beshear’s decision not to file his proposed constitutional amendment to expand gambling until after the filing deadline for legislative candidates indicated that he had serious doubts about support for it among Kentuckians. The Family Foundation opposes the legislation and claims the Governor does not have legislative support to pass the bill.

Cothran pointed to claims from the Governor and wealthy gambling interests that Kentuckians supported the legislation by a wide margin, as well as to the Governor’s claim that he had the votes in the Senate to pass the bill and asked why, if these things were true, there was any reason for Beshear to wait to file the bill.

“If Kentuckians overwhelmingly support this bill and if he really has 23 votes in the State Senate to the extent the Governor claims,” asked Martin Cothran, spokesman for the group, “then why does he have to wait until after the filing deadline to introduce it? He obviously lacks confidence in his own legislation.”

“The Governor needs to stop playing politics with this issue and introduce his legislation,” said Cothran. “How can you blame other people for the failure of your own legislation, as this Governor has done, when you don’t even have the courage to file your bill?”

Cothran said last week that the Governor was bluffing. “This is just further proof that the Governor and his wealthy casino supporters don’t have the support they claim.”

BUYING ILLINOIS

Gambling expansion is like quicksand.  Once you step in you cannot get out and you continue to sink ever lower.  Illinois is in a vast quicksand trap of gambling, in some measure due to poor lobbying and disclosure laws.

First was the lottery, one of the largest.  Then came the riverboats.  In 2007 up to 45,000 slot machines were authorized in truck stops, liquor stores and fraternal organizations.  This law was upheld by the elected Illinois Supreme Court in July 2011.  Then  SB 744 passed the House and Senate last year, but which has not been signed by the Governor, which would have tripled the number of slots in casinos.  All this was due to vociferous public demand, right?

Until 2010 Illinois had no restrictions on donations to legislators.  Illinois does not require lobbyists to indicate their income from their clients, which many experts regard as the vast majority of money spent to influence legislators.  In the House supporters received four times as much money as opponents from gambling interests.  And this is only the tip of the iceberg.  Lobbyists in Illinois reported spending $1.3 million on legislators, while in Pennsylvania with about the same population but more complete reporting requirements lobbyists reported $470 million.

This disparity is in the unreported contributions to legislators in Illinois.  But the Illinois State Board of Elections indicated that that one legislator received over a half million in donations from gambling interests, three more received $100,000 to $350,000.  All the top 30 legislators received over $25,000 each from the gambling representatives.  Big money provides access to legislators that most of us do not have.  Of those top 30 recipients 21 voted for SB 744. Others hid from their constituents behind “Present” votes and did not vote against it.

- Ivan Zabilka, Research Consultant to The Family Foundation

Data from James Browning, “Payout: The Campaign Contributions of the Gambling Industry in Illinois from 2002 to June2011,” Common Cause Illinois, July 26, 2011.

PRESS RELEASE: Family Foundation files open records requests with Governor’s office, State Police

For Immediate Release
February 1, 2012
Contact: Martin Cothran
Phone: (859) 329-1919

LEXINGTON, KY–The Family Foundation today filed open records requests with the office of the Governor and the Kentucky State Police asking about meetings and correspondence between the Governor’s office and casino interests in the formulation of a constitutional amendment to expand gambling in the state.

“We think there should be full disclosure about the individuals and the wealthy corporations who may have been involved in the attempt to rewrite Kentucky’s Constitution,” said Martin Cothran, spokesman for the group.

Cothran said he thought many Kentuckians would find it disturbing if it turned out that wealthy horse tracks and casino corporations were heavily involved in changing the Constitution in a way in which they stood to financially benefit. “People don’t want their laws written in smoke-filled back rooms by millionaire businessmen whose names they don’t even know,” he said. “This process needs to be out in the open.”